14.01.22

Wild Salmon Strategy Statement

 
Share
  • Wildfish
  • Wildfish
  • Wildfish
  • Wildfish

Too little, too late

Regrettably, the detail within Scottish Government’s new Wild Salmon Strategy provides little cause for optimism.

On the positive side, we welcome the requirement for SEPA to review all existing CAR licences with a view to improving fish passage (salmon need unrestricted access to as much of river catchments as possible to maximise juvenile production) and the possibility of exploring “new means to improve investment in Scotland’s rivers” although we are sceptical as to the wisdom of “investigating private sector contributions” if they might come from sectors that have damaged salmon.

The proper way to ensure that the ‘polluter pays’ is via existing regulatory controls, the use of civil penalties such as restoration notices and the use of the existing legal mechanism for imposing liability for environmental damage.

The Strategy relies on a great deal of further research and the timescales are far from ambitious – for example, the Strategy does not, in itself, change anything in-river, with the aim being to produce an “implementation plan” at some stage within the next 12 months.

On the question of the negative impacts of salmon farming on wild salmon, the Strategy continues the political focus of the current Scottish Government on facilitating the expansion of fish farming at the expense of all else, emphasising that Marine Scotland Science will “continue to support assessments of risk and mitigation options to facilitate sustainable development of Scotland’s…. aquaculture industries”. One of the members of the Wild Salmon Strategy Stakeholder Advisory Group is Salmon Scotland (formerly Scottish Salmon Producers Organisation).

The Strategy emphasises Scottish Government’s commitment to “playing an active role in the effective functioning of NASCO and the development and implementation of NASCO resolutions, agreements and guidelines”. However, no mention is made of the Scottish Government failure, over 18 years, to meet NASCO’s 2003 resolution on salmon farming impacts that “there is no increase in sea lice loads or lice-induced mortality of wild salmonids attributable to the farms”.

Find out more about our work to save wild salmon from the threat of open-net salmon farming by clicking on this links below. 

A literature review: the impacts of open-net salmon farming on wild fish and the environment. 

Pledge your support: do not buy, eat or sell farmed salmon

The campaign: what we’re fighting for 

 
Leave a comment

Related articles

 

WildFish celebrates landmark move towards improved transparency of Scottish organic salmon farming

WildFish is celebrating another victory this week in its battle against the poor environmental record of Scottish salmon farms,...
Read More

How is our new report going to help better protect wild salmon populations?

At WildFish, we use scientific research and data to guide our campaign against open-net salmon farming and its harmful effects ...
Read More

New WildFish report finds consumers could be misled as to the reality of the farmed salmon they are purchasing

WildFish has released a new report that shows Scottish farmed salmon is being marketed in such a way that consumers could be mi...
Read More

Support Us

Support like yours allows our determined campaigning team to fight the destruction caused by open-net salmon farming, pollution and over-abstraction

Find out more

Find out about all the ways in which you can help wild fish…