Wild Salmon Strategy Statement

  • Wildfish
  • Wildfish
  • Wildfish
  • Wildfish

Too little, too late

Regrettably, the detail within Scottish Government’s new Wild Salmon Strategy provides little cause for optimism.

On the positive side, we welcome the requirement for SEPA to review all existing CAR licences with a view to improving fish passage (salmon need unrestricted access to as much of river catchments as possible to maximise juvenile production) and the possibility of exploring “new means to improve investment in Scotland’s rivers” although we are sceptical as to the wisdom of “investigating private sector contributions” if they might come from sectors that have damaged salmon.

The proper way to ensure that the ‘polluter pays’ is via existing regulatory controls, the use of civil penalties such as restoration notices and the use of the existing legal mechanism for imposing liability for environmental damage.

The Strategy relies on a great deal of further research and the timescales are far from ambitious – for example, the Strategy does not, in itself, change anything in-river, with the aim being to produce an “implementation plan” at some stage within the next 12 months.

On the question of the negative impacts of salmon farming on wild salmon, the Strategy continues the political focus of the current Scottish Government on facilitating the expansion of fish farming at the expense of all else, emphasising that Marine Scotland Science will “continue to support assessments of risk and mitigation options to facilitate sustainable development of Scotland’s…. aquaculture industries”. One of the members of the Wild Salmon Strategy Stakeholder Advisory Group is Salmon Scotland (formerly Scottish Salmon Producers Organisation).

The Strategy emphasises Scottish Government’s commitment to “playing an active role in the effective functioning of NASCO and the development and implementation of NASCO resolutions, agreements and guidelines”. However, no mention is made of the Scottish Government failure, over 18 years, to meet NASCO’s 2003 resolution on salmon farming impacts that “there is no increase in sea lice loads or lice-induced mortality of wild salmonids attributable to the farms”.

Find out more about our work to save wild salmon from the threat of open-net salmon farming by clicking on this links below. 

A literature review: the impacts of open-net salmon farming on wild fish and the environment. 

Pledge your support: do not buy, eat or sell farmed salmon

The campaign: what we’re fighting for 

Leave a comment

Related articles


Chefs decry industry greenwashing as WildFish launches appeal to stop the removal of “farmed” from “Scottish farmed salmon” protected name

WildFish has issued a formal appeal in the General Regulatory Chamber of the Tribunal against the UK Secretary of State for Foo...
Read More

WildFish make legal complaint to environment watchdog for SEPA’s failure to protect endangered wild salmon from sea lice parasites

WildFish and Coastal Communities Network (Scotland) have submitted a formal complaint to Environmental Standards Scotland (ESS)...
Read More

Why WildFish campaigns to end open-net salmon farming

Our focus on ending salmon farming in Scotland is sometimes the subject of question – what is the link between farmed salmon, a...
Read More

Support Us

Support like yours allows our determined campaigning team to fight the destruction caused by open-net salmon farming, pollution and over-abstraction

Find out more

Find out about all the ways in which you can help wild fish…